Brining Back Classic Cartoon Network & Nickelodeon Shows?

Category : Region III

Brining Back Classic Cartoon Network & Nickelodeon Shows?

Recently The Washington Post supposedly posted an online article stating that Cartoon Network Inc. and Nickelodeon Studios had posted an online community poll requesting feedback on improving their broadcasting techniques and the content that they now support, which would eventually improve ratings and there for profits. Also during this study voters and or fans of the companies ask the following question “What about bringing back some of your previous content and the old shows we all know, love and grew up watch – CaterJP567″ which supposedly lead to the two boards thinking and speculating if they should indeed bring certain shows and or content back. Now for those who don’t know these two companies or needs some background and light on the situation:

Cartoon Network (abbreviated CN, corporately known as The Cartoon Network, Inc.) is an American cable television network created by Turner Broadcasting which primarily shows animated programming.

The original series and the Time Warner acquisition

The network’s first original show was The Moxy Show and was first aired in 1993. In 1994, Hanna-Barbera’s new subsidiary Cartoon Network Studios was founded and started production on The What-A-Cartoon! Show (also known as World-Premiere Toons and “What-A-Cartoon”), a series of creator-driven short cartoons that premiered on Cartoon Network in 1995.[4] It was the network’s third original series (the second wasSpace Ghost Coast to Coast). The project was spearheaded by several Cartoon Network executives, plus The Ren & Stimpy Show creator John Kricfalusi (who was an advisor to the network at the time) and Fred Seibert (who was formerly one of the driving forces behind the Nicktoons, and would go on to produce the similar animation anthology series Oh, Yeah! Cartoons and Random Cartoons).[5]

The chief purpose of The What A Cartoon Show was to help Cartoon Network expand its library of exclusive programming and it introduced a number of new cartoon ideas. Six of them were spun off into their own series runs. These six series, Dexter’s Laboratory (1996), Johnny Bravo, Cow and Chicken (1997), The Powerpuff Girls (1998), Mike, Lu & Og, and Courage the Cowardly Dog (1999) became the origins of the network’s original cartoons, collectively known as Cartoon Cartoons.[4]I Am Weasel (1997) and Ed, Edd n Eddy (1999) were the first two Cartoon Cartoons not to be introduced in a What A Cartoon short.[4]

In 1996, Turner merged with Time Warner.[6] This consolidated ownership of all the WB cartoons, so now post-July 1948 and the former Sunset-owned black-and-white cartoons (which Warner Brothers had reacquired in the 1960s) releases were being shown on the network. Newer animated productions by WB also started appearing on the network—mostly reruns of shows that had aired on Kids’ WB, plus certain new programs such as Justice League.

Cartoon Network’s programming would not be available in Canada until 1997, when a Canadian specialty network Teletoon (and its French language counterpart) was launched.[citation needed]

Cartoon Network underwent its makeover in 1997, launching the Power House era until June 13, 2004. The channel used bumpers involving characters from most of the cartoons it aired with the Powerhouse music, or just objects and places with the Cartoon Network’s logo at that time. The Powerhouse music was no longer used starting in 2003.

————————–

Nickelodeon (usually abbreviated as “Nick”, and originally named Pinwheel from December 1, 1977 to March 31, 1979), is an American cable television networkowned by MTV Networks, a subsidiary of Viacom International. The channel is primarily aimed at children ages 6–14, with the exception of their weekday morning program block aimed at preschoolers ages 2–5. Since 2006, Nickelodeon has been run by MTVN Kids & Family Group president Cyma Zarghami.

As of 2010, Nickelodeon is ranked as the #1 cable channel among the kids 2-11 and 6-11 demographics, outranking competitors Disney Channel and Cartoon Network.[1] For most of its history, the channel had been promoted as “The First Kids’ Network,” as Nickelodeon was the first American television network aimed at children, dating back to its days under the Pinwheel name.

Nickelodeon’s broadcast day runs on Sunday through Thursdays from 7 a.m.-8 p.m., Fridays from 7 a.m.-9 p.m. and Saturdays from 7 a.m.-10 p.m. (Eastern andPacific Time). It shares its channel space with Nick at Nite, a nighttime channel/programming block airing mainly sitcom reruns, created in 1985, that airs during the interim hours and is treated as a separate channel from Nickelodeon by A.C. Nielsen Co. for ratings purposes.[2][3] The two services are sometimes referred to under the collective name “Nickelodeon/Nick at Nite”, due to their association as two individual channels sharing the same channel space.

By October 1990, Nickelodeon was seen in 52 million homes across the United States[citation needed] . In 1990, Nickelodeon opened Nickelodeon Studios, a television studio/attraction at Universal Studios Florida inOrlando which many of its sitcoms and game shows were filmed and entered into a multimillion-dollar joint marketing agreement with international restaurant chain Pizza Hut, which involved launching Nickelodeon Magazine,[citation needed] available for free at participating Pizza Hut restaurants.[9] In 1991, for the first time, Nickelodeon developed its first animated series, Doug, Rugrats, and The Ren and Stimpy Show. These series, known as Nicktoons, premiered on August 11, 1991.[10] The network had previously refused to produce weekly animated series due to high cost.[10] The three Nicktoons found success by 1993, while in mid-1993, Nickelodeon developed its fourth Nicktoon, Rocko’s Modern Life, which was also a success along with the three other Nicktoons. Later, Nickelodeon partnered with Sony Wonder and released top selling video cassettes of the show’s programming.[11] By 1994, Doug ended production and on May 22, 1994, Rugrats was in a production hiatus, but Rocko’s Modern Life and The Ren and Stimpy Show were still in production and airing. In mid-1996, Nickelodeon developed two new Nicktoons, KaBlam! and Hey Arnold! which would take the place of Rocko’s Modern Life and The Ren and Stimpy Show since they would both end production about that time, but still would air reruns up until about 2001. Rugrats, on the other hand, returned from hiatus on May 9, 1997 (reruns continued to air up until that point). In 1998, The Rugrats Moviecame out. The movie grossed more than 0 million in the United States and became the first non-Disney animated movie to ever earn that much. Then in 1999, the channel debuted the animated seriesSpongeBob SquarePants, which quickly became one of the most popular Nicktoons in the network’s history, and has remained very popular to this day, consistently ranking as the channel’s highest-rated series since the early 2000s.[12]

In August 1992, the channel extended its Saturday schedule to 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. ET with the launch of a primetime block called SNICK, which was home to shows such as Are You Afraid of the Dark?, Clarissa Explains It All, All That, The Amanda Show and Kenan & Kel; in 2004, the block was reformatted as the Saturday edition of TEENick (which originally debuted on Sunday evenings in 2000), and the Saturday night block continues today without a name (the TEENick branding, with its spelling altered to TeenNick, has since been used on the Nicklelodeon sister channel previously known as The N). In June 1993, Nickelodeon resumed its magazine brand, Nickelodeon Magazine.[13] In 1994, Nickelodeon removed You Can’t Do That on Television from its schedule after thirteen years and by the same year the network had launched a new sketch comedy show, All That. For many years, until its cancellation in 2005, All That would launch the careers of many actors and actresses including Kenan Thompson, Amanda Bynes, and Jamie Lynn Spears. The show’s executive producer, Dan Schneider, would go on to create and produce several hit series for Nickelodeon including The Amanda Show, Drake & Josh,Zoey 101, iCarly and Victorious, among others.

Sources - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon_Networkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickelodeon_(TV_channel)

So the situation in the end has indeed started a lot of speculation and I’m sure the two companies will indeed give the fans, and families what they want and bring back that classic feel a lot of us know and loved.

In closing there have been rumors and supposed interview with some of the staff from both companies stating “You guys asked for it and since we love the fans we are giving you guys what you want, new seasons of most of you alls favorite classic shows have already underway, no promises due the the fact a lot of the original supports have gone under but keep your eyes open in late 2011″

- Anonymous Source


Article from articlesbase.com

Back-to-Back Winning Seasons and Bowl Appearances Say Michigan State Is Back

Category : Region III

Back-to-Back Winning Seasons and Bowl Appearances Say Michigan State Is Back

Copyright © 2009 Ed Bagley

When Mark Dantonio became the new Michigan State University football coach two years ago, he came to the East Lansing Campus with a pedigree that shouted success is on the way. He has not disappointed the Spartan faithful.

Michigan State had not done diddly-squat since its 1999 team went 10-2, whipped Florida in the Citrus Bowl, led the Big Ten in total defense, and ranked 7th in the final polls. Times have changed in East Lansing. If diddly-squat shows up since Dantonio has arrived, he is in for a fight.

Here is what Dantonio has accomplished since his debut 55-18 victory against UAB (the University of Alabama at Birmingham):

Turn a losing program into a winning one by going 7-5 in his first regular season, and getting Michigan State its first bowl appearance in 4 years. Despite being a 5-point underdog to No. 14-ranked Boston College in the Champs Sports Bowl, the Spartans only lost by a field goal, 24-21.

Their final 7-6 record included a 4-3 mark against bowl-bound teams, and the Spartans lost the 6 games by a total of 31 points, including two in overtime. All 6 games were decided by 7 points or less. It is called defense.

With their 31-14 victory over the Fighting Irish of Notre Dame on the road in 2007, the Spartans became the first visiting team to win 6-straight games in the 77-year history of Notre Dame Stadium.

Last year the progress continued as the Spartans went 9-3 in the regular season, beating Michigan and Notre Dame. They lost at California in their opener 38-31, took it on the chin 45-7 against No. 12-ranked Ohio State at home, and let No. 7-ranked Penn State take it to them 49-18 on the road at Happy Valley.

Had they beaten Penn State, they would have had a share of the Big Ten title. Michigan State’s 6-2 Big Ten record was its best since the 1999 season, and its 9 wins represented only the 3rd time since 1966 (the year I graduated from Michigan State) that it had won 9 games in a season. Last season’s second step forward led to the No. 19-ranked Spartans facing off against the No. 16-ranked Georgia Bulldogs in the Capital One Bowl; State lost 24-12. Nevertheless, they ended the year with their second straight winning season (7-6 and 9-4)—their first back-to-back winning seasons in 19 years—and their second straight bowl appearance—their first back-to-back bowl appearances in 12 years.

That is what is calling “getting after it”.

Dantonio really became prominent as the defensive coordinator for Ohio State, where his defensive unit helped the Buckeyes to a 32-6 record in 3 years, and the 2002 National Championship. In the championship year, Ohio State was 2nd nationally in scoring defense (13 points a game) and 3rd in rushing defense (77 yards per game).

Coming into this season, Michigan States loses two All Big Ten seniors—tailback Javon Ringer and safety Otis Wiley, and returns All Big Ten junior linebacker Greg Jones.

To say Ringer left a hole in the running game would be a gross understatement. He rushed for 1,637 yards (accounting for 97% of Michigan State’s rushing offense) and scored a school-record 22 touchdowns. Ringer, a consensus All American, was drafted by the NFL’s Tennessee Titans.

Ringer’s starting spot will be a competitive battle that just may be won by either of two outstanding freshmen—Edwin Baker out of Oak Park High School in Highland Park, or Larry Caper out of Battle Creek Central in Battle Creek. Baker is 5-9 and 200, and Caper is 5-11 and 215. Both are potentially explosive runners with some speed.

Replacing senior quarterback Brian Hoyer, an inconsistent 2-year starter, is also an issue. Sophomore Kirk Cousins and redshirt sophomore Keith Nichol have limited experience, appearing in only a combined 8 games.

All Big Ten junior Greg Jones had 127 tackles last year, and is arguably the best linebacker in the Big Ten. He must remain tough and healthy for Michigan State to again compete for the Big Ten title.

The Spartan offense will also rely heavily on kicker Brett Swenson (22 field goals last year, including one last-minute, game-winner on a weak offense); wide receivers Blair White, Mark Dell and BJ Cunningham; tight end Charlie Gantt; guard Joel Foreman and center Joel Nitchman.

Dantonio’s two recruiting classes must produce more new faces on the field this year. New faces better than the players they will replace. In its two biggest games of the year last season—Ohio State and Penn State—Michigan State did not show well and paid for it when the Preseason Coaches’ Top 25 Poll found them absent.

Major coaches generally applauded the fact that the Spartans did not take a dive late last season, they won many games they have lost in prior years, but when push came to shove, it was still Ohio State and Penn State on top of the heap.

What many boosters may have missed is the fact that Michigan State took one huge step forward in bowl participation. Two years ago they had to settle for the Champs Sports Bowl and a .25 million payout. Last year they moved up to the Capital One Bowl and a .25 million payout. After the 5 BCS bowl games, the Capital One Bowl is the highest paying and most prestigious of the remaining 34 bowl games played last season.

Michigan State’s schedule is favorable this year. The Spartans get both Michigan and Penn State at home, and do not play Ohio State. They also play 1-AA Montana State, Central Michigan and Western Michigan. If they cannot beat the latter three teams and Michigan, they have no business going to a bowl game.

On a more positive note, while virtually everyone West of the Mississippi River thinks Michigan State could not possibly run the table, there is at least one Spartan in Washington State who thinks otherwise. Never underestimate what Mark Dantonio can accomplish.

What if the Spartans beat Notre Dame, Michigan and the rest, and face Penn State at home with an 11-0 mark? That is why college football is so great. It could happen. The odds say it will not happen, but rest assured that if Michigan State plays in a BCS bowl game this season, it will be another giant step forward for Mark Dantonio and his Spartans.

Read more of my football coverage, including:
“Not Being Selected Among the Top 25 in the Preseason Coaches’ Poll Is the Kiss of Death – You Have No BCS Title Shot”
Individual Articles on All 34 of College Football’s 2008 Bowl Games.
15 Weekly Wrap-Up Articles on College Football’s 2008 Regular Season Games.
http://www.edbagleyblog.com
http://www.edbagleyblog.com/Sports.html


Article from articlesbase.com

Related University Of Michigan Articles

Are You Afraid of Going Back to School?

Category : Region I

Are You Afraid of Going Back to School?

This comfort zone however, may have left you feeling unwilling to explore new options.  But just because going back to school might have you worrying about stepping foot into the unknown, you may not want to shoot down the idea just because you’re uncomfortable with it.  Here are a few things to consider that might make you feel a little bit better about heading back to further your education.

Take it Slow

You don’t have to go jumping headlong into a full college course load right away.  Going from 0 to 60 too fast could be a shock to your system.  If you have the opportunity, and if you aren’t under any sort of time constraints, you might consider easing back into your schoolwork.

Taking a refresher class or two in order to get yourself back into mental shape might not be a bad idea.  Just like getting back into a workout routine, overdoing it right away can be frustrating and even counterproductive.  While you may be in a rush to get your academic career jumpstarted in a short amount of time, moving too quickly can leave you stressed and under a lot of pressure.  Your mind, just like your body in a physical workout, might need to ease back slowly into such an educational transition.

Remember When…

While it can be frightening going back to school, just remember, you used to do this after summer vacation each year from the time you were five or so, until you were probably 18.  And back then, you likely had a lot less knowledge and real world experience than you do now.  So when things get a little scary regarding going back to school, remember, you’ve played this game before and with a lot less experience behind you.

Over the years you may have picked up many techniques and skills that can make you more effective in your learning.  You could be surprised at how quickly the ability to learn, study, and all those little tricks you used to use in school to further your education come flooding back.

You Have Options

It can be important to bear in mind when you’re heading back to school that you aren’t being forced to do so.  It’s not like when you were in grade school and the truancy officer was going to show up if you missed too many days.  You have options here, as well as your own free will.

Delve into career colleges. Here you have the ability complete a certificate or diploma program in a few months, this will help you get a feel of what college is all about and even help you move into a career much sooner than you anticipated. There’s a huge demand for people with skills in culinary arts, human resources, massage therapy, medical assisting, radiology and more. You can view a complete list of subjects in our career colleges channel, which will also help you get started in learning more about the programs and schools.

Finally, there’s always the option to attend an online college. Today, many traditional schools like University of Maryland, University of Massachusetts, Northeastern University and others are offering  online degrees in fields ranging from accounting, business, nursing, psychology, health care and more. You can earn a degree from the comforts of your home. You can find a complete directory in our online education channel, get started by browsing and requesting information from the colleges.

If you get started on your education and realize it isn’t for you, no one is holding a gun to your head, forcing you to keep going.  Even though you may have taken a calculated risk, sometimes even the best laid plans don’t work out quite as you expected.  Sure, you might lose some time and money in the process, but if things aren’t going as planned, you can always re-evaluate your situation, and maybe try again in the future when things are going more in your favor or you find a program that is better fitted to your needs.

JustColleges provides information on accredited online education providers,top colleges in usa,online schools that offer online degrees, online courses,online college degree,online degree programs,online education degree as well as career colleges that offer diplomas and degrees to get your career started right away.


Article from articlesbase.com

Find More Northeastern University Articles

Get back that confident smile with cosmetic dental Sydney services

Category : Other Students

Get back that confident smile with cosmetic dental Sydney services

Everyone is conscious about their looks and personality. The way you look to others makes a big impact on your lives and careers. Teeth are a key part of any person’s personality. Whenever you smile or laugh or even speak to others, the bright white shining teeth add to your personality and lend you the charm. Now, imagine that these teeth are decaying or missing from their place. Will it still look as good as the earlier one? Naturally, it will not be that good a look. For this specific reason of improving the looks of the teeth, cosmetic dentistry is used by the people around the world.

Whenever there is a problem with your teeth like the yellowness, tooth decay, broken or partially eaten teeth, teeth lost due to some accident or even the simple tooth ache, there is a need to provide the necessary medication and apply the cosmetic technique to give the teeth the improved look. Cosmetic Dentistry Sydney takes care of a number of problems with your teeth. These could be the wide spacing between the teeth, the overcrowding of the teeth, misalignment of upper and lower jaws, the titled or non-straight teeth, broken or decayed tooth or even the missing teeth.

Cosmetic dentistry will make use of the different techniques and tools at its disposal to not only improve the look of the teeth but also impart it a better functionality. The crowns and the bridges are used to provide the cover to the vacant spaces arisen as a result of the missing tooth. Even the dental implants technique can be used for providing the base for the covering cap. These implants improve the chewing functionality of teeth to near normal levels and even do not require the support of the adjoining teeth which means exerting pressure on them as well. Once the implants are done, the same are covered with the crowns and bridges which could be of metal, porcelain or other composite.

The porcelain veneers are very thin (of the thickness of a fingernail) and these are fixed on the front part of the teeth to give the natural and wonderful smile. There are used to hide the extra large gaps between the teeth as well as to give a tooth like look where there is no real tooth. The porcelain ones are the most favoured since these match the colour of the teeth and will not look bad or different from the other teeth. These impart a natural colour to the teeth.

The teeth get the yellowish appearance since people drink or eat a number of things which can leave yellowish stains on teeth. The yellowness can be removed with the help of laser-based dental technique which brings back the whiteness on teeth. Whatever be the nature of the teeth problem, it can be improved functionally and aesthetically giving it a better look as well as enabling chewing. But each case could be unique and different and, therefore, the treatment will be different as well.

Gentledentalcare is one-stop cosmetic dentistry Sydney centre with one of the best Cosmetic Dentistry Sydney in Sydney. Which provides porcelain veneers surgeries with state of the art equipment.


Article from articlesbase.com

College Football – Steve Sarkisian Puts the Washington Football Program Back on Track to Succeed

Category : Region V

College Football – Steve Sarkisian Puts the Washington Football Program Back on Track to Succeed

Copyright © 2009 Ed Bagley

In a scant 60 minutes, the University of Washington’s entire football program went from a lingering negative impact since the departure of legendary coach Don James in 1993, to a positive impact when the Huskies opened their 2009 season against No. 11-ranked Louisiana State University.

Don James is affectionately known as the “Dawgfather” on the U-Dub campus. He is the role model for successful coaches at the University of Washington. James won 22 consecutive games from 1990 to 1992, a national championship, and took the Huskies to 6 Rose Bowls (4-2) and 15 bowl games (10-5) in 18 years.

His 153-57-2 record (a 72% winning percentage) is the standard by which all others are measured. When the Dawgfather speaks, even 16 years after being an active coach, hundreds of people line up to listen intently, and well they should. Fans greet him the reverence and respect he has earned.

Sixteen years of not performing up to Husky football standards had gone beyond tarnishing the image of Washington as an every-year Pac-10 contender and premiere national program to a dismal, inexcusable 0-12 team last year. Clearly, change was not only in order, it had become a “life and death issue” that was not going away.

Enter University of Washington’s President Mark Emmert and new Director of Athletics Scott Woodward and “BAM!”—like Emeril Lagasse putting spice into a recipe—the Huskies had a new head coach, Steve Sarkisian, and a new defensive coordinator and assistant head coach, Nick Holt. Both came from University of Southern California’s program, where Sarkisian was the assistant head coach and offensive coordinator, and Holt was the defensive coordinator.

USC has been the most consistently successful football program in the country during the past 7 years. The Trojans have won at least 10 games a season for the past 7 years, and have been in 7 consecutive BCS (Bowl Championship Series) games—winning 6 of 7 BCS games, including the National Championship against Oklahoma in 2004. Their only BCS loss was to Texas in the 2005 National Championship Game.

Both the consecutive 10-win seasons and the number of BCS appearances are records. Along with head coach Pete Carroll, Sarkisian and Holt were an integral part of USC’s success, and now they are patrolling the field and sidelines at Husky Stadium.

The doors which barred key boosters, parents, fans and supporters from attending Husky practice and participating in Husky nation under the old regime were thrown open again. No more silence and no more exclusion as the old brain trust systematically screwed up the program almost beyond repair.

In through the open doors flew new enthusiasm, a new start, a new system, and a new chance for the great unwashed and undisciplined to come back into the fold. Now former players and coaches are once again welcomed and encouraged to participate in the Huskies’ drive to success.

The Huskies, who have had to endure 14 straight losses, endured another one in their opener at home against LSU. But there was a clear difference: the Huskies won the battle of ball movement but lost the war, 31-23, while something very important happened.

The LSU Tigers and their coaching staff said and did all of the right things leading up to the kickoff, but inside they were really full of themselves in spite of themselves, all smart and snotty and ready to stomp the Huskies silly. But, as Mark Twain once declared, “the news of his death has been greatly exaggerated.”

The Tigers left Husky Stadium realizing they had to do everything humanly possible to come out with a victory. There would be no crowing on the flight back to Baton Rouge. Amen. Husky football is back with a roar, young talent, intensity and a newfound hope for excellent execution on every play.

Forget a play-by-play description of what happened when the No. 11-ranked LSU Tigers came to Seattle. Here is all you need to know to realize the Huskies are back:

1) Washington received the opening kickoff and promptly moved down the field in a 10-play, 79-yard drive that culminated with a 17-yard touchdown pass to James Johnson. Johnson, who is 6-0 and 193, is a true freshman. He had 6 catches for 63 yards in his first college game.

2) Chris Polk picked up 90 yards on 21 carries for a 4.2 average per carry, including a breakaway run of 33 yards, and other runs for 12, 12, 9 and 9 yards. Polk, who is 5-11 and 210, is a redshirt freshman.

3) Jake Locker went 25-for-45 for 321 yards and 2 touchdowns—the 17-yarder to James Johnson and a 9-yarder to Kavario Middleton. Locker, who is 6-3 and 226, is a junior who is learning to be an NFL pocket passer under Sarkisian’s new system. Locker is a running threat with speed, and picked up 51 yards in 12 carries, including runs to convert first downs and keep drives alive.

Locker was responsible for giving up points in Washington’s second drive of the night. He threw into coverage on a sideline pattern and Tiger linebacker Jacob Cutrera intercepted the ball and returned it untouched for 29 yards and a defensive TD. All things considered, Locker did well in his first attempt under a new system as an NFL pocket passer.

4) In addition to completing passes to James Johnson (6 catches for 63 yards) and Kavrio Middleton (5 for 45), Locker also completed passes to 7 other receivers—Devin Aguilar (4 catches for 76 yards), Johri Fogerson (2 for 58), Chris Polk (2 for 34), D’Andre Goodwin (2 for 19), Jermaine Kearse (2 for 12), Jordan Polk (1 for 12), and Paul Homer (1 for 2). Locker was going through his reads.

5) Homer is a senior fullback and Goodwin a junior wide receiver, but 5 others are sophomores—wide receivers Aguilar, Kearse and Chris Polk, tailback Fogerson, and tight end Middleton—while Jordan Polk is a redshirt freshman tailback, and Johnson is a true freshman. Ah, youth and talent.

6) Sarkisian’s new look offense outgained LSU by 157 yards, 428 to 321, and the Huskies ran 83 plays to LSU’s 48.

7) Sarkisian’s offense went beyond midfield and into Tiger territory on 9 of 11 drives. The Huskies were moving the ball. Forgerson did let a ball drop in the end zone that should have been a Husky TD, and Chris Polk did fumble on the Tiger 5-yard line on another drive. The Huskies are still young, still inexperienced and did make mistakes, but they also put on a show that spelled P-R-O-G-R-E-S-S is on the way.

8) Five times the Huskies were in the red zone and had to settle for field goals and endure a turnover. The LSU Tigers had to be shaking in the cleats, wondering if they could hold the fort from a varied attack.

The message is now clear—Washington Husky football is back. Steve Sarkisian is going to spread the field, he is going to get a lot of players involved on the field, and he is not afraid to play young, talented position players immediately.

Back Stories – Burning Angel’s Joanna Angel (critical commentary)

Category : Region I

Back Stories – Burning Angel’s Joanna Angel (critical commentary)

Rutgers University – named Most Diverse National University for thirteen consecutive years by U.S. News & World Report’s “America’s Best Colleges,” ranked one of the top 63 North American research universities by the prestigious Association of American Universities, first in the nation for graduate programs in School Library Services and Women’s History…

…and former stomping grounds of punk rock porno princess Joanna Angel.

Several “unicorns,” or fantastic mythical legends that people want to believe regardless of the fact that no evidence substantiating them exists, about and around porn have haunted US culture for decades. Some major ones include: porn is only made by men, and the industry itself is run by the skeeziest men of all; although all talent are stupid, women talent are stupid and naïve (presumably because they are being taken advantage of by those aforesaid men); porn people party party party and do very little “actual” work; and finally, although some feminists may see the potential for sexual liberation in adult content, no self-respecting feminist would ever in their right mind make porn!

I can assure you that each of these presumptions is far from true and there are many people who can substantiate that claim with their personal experiences and work, but don’t take my word for it – the brilliant, beautiful, and super hott Joanna Angel took more than a minute out from running her “mini-empire” to answer some questions for Porn Valley Vantage. Her perspective picks a fight with those aforementioned unicorns and several of their friends. Read on!!

First off, thanks so much for taking the time out for this Joanna. I know you’re crazy busy and have been at this whole porn thing for a long time… but for how long exactly? And, for those who don’t know, what specifically do you do?

“Well jeez… I started my first website eight years ago. I don’t know if that means I’ve been in the industry for eight years; but, at the very least, I’ve been naked on the internet for eight years. What do I do? Well I direct, produce, and star in my own porn movies. My company, Burning Angel, is known as one of the originators of the ‘alt porn’ genre, meaning we feature models with tattoos and piercings… girls who represent more of the alt/indie subculture. In addition to the adult content, we also feature band interviews and record reviews. So, in a nutshell, I guess you can say I run a mini-empire filled with sex and rock & roll!

Haha nice – I bet most people would love to run their own mini-empire, especially one filled with sex and rock & roll!! So, what got you into the business in the first place? What did you do before?

I got myself into the business! No one and nothing really got me in. I was in college, and my roommate and I thought it would be fun and interesting to start a porn site… so we did. It was very small at first, just a few photo sets of our friends and of myself. It didn’t really feel like I was ‘getting into the industry,’ which is a funny thing about internet companies. You don’t have anything tangible to represent what you do. A few years later, the company became more of a reality when I started meeting other people in the business and we began producing and updating the website on a regular basis. Then it really became my job and my life. Until then, it almost felt like a science experiment!

Before porn, I was a full-time student at Rutgers University. I had random part time jobs on the side such as waiting tables or working as a cashier at a piercing place. Nothing too particularly exciting.

So, what’s your favorite thing about working as talent? What’s most surprising or unexpected?

Umm… the sex?? Haha! but really, the sex is pretty damn good. And on that same note, I think what has been most surprising for me is the amazing sex I’ve had with people who were just not my ‘type’ at all. Before porn, I always kinda hooked up with the same types of guys – guys who were in the same age range, listened to the same music, and dressed pretty similar. I don’t know why that happened… if they were just the people I was attracted to or, in some instances, the people I thought I was supposed to be attracted to. In porn, I’ve worked with guys I would never have thought were attractive at all and have had some of the best sex of my life with them. It’s really pretty amazing! I will say that the whole experience has made me a lot more open-minded, and I don’t believe in really having a ‘type’ anymore. I mean, before I got into porn I would have never thought I could share something so passionate with, for example, a 55 year-old married German father of three (whose wife and three kids, incidentally, I’ve met on several occasions – I think they’re great, and they think I’m great!).

Oh wow… this idea of moving beyond ‘type’ is really interesting, but what about the other aspects of your work? Is there anything surprising or unexpected about your work behind the scenes?

Well I think the way this business operates is pretty fascinating – the way shoots can be so predictable and unpredictable at the same time, the way something feels in person as opposed to the way it’s translated on camera. And what I really find fascinating is considering website traffic and determining what areas or what girls get clicked on a lot versus who or what barely gets clicked on at all. I feel like I’m able to look at the world in a very 1984-ish way when I stare at the stats and realize the last things I would ever expect people to like are actually very popular.

When I first started running this company, I only had a passion for the creative side of things – planning out scenes, casting them, planning out the ideas, and writing funny dialogue. But as time as gone by I’ve really come to love the ‘business’ end of this business and figuring out what sells, what doesn’t, what people like, what they don’t, and how different types of marketing can affect these numbers. It really is quite fascinating!

Man this sound like it takes up A LOT of time… has working in the industry affected your personal life at all?

Yeah… in the sense that I don’t really have one anymore! Haha! but I think anyone who owns any kind of business is in the same boat. Running your own company is really difficult; and whereas most employees of a company only have to think about accomplishing their duties, the owner has to think about everyone’s duties plus their own. And let me tell you – doing only a quarter of this stuff naked with a dick in my a** is not an easy task!

I used to read a lot of books, and last week I finally got around to reading a book that I have seriously been too busy to read for the past three years. I love playing video games, and it’s been at least 18 months since I touched my Wii. I’ve lost touch with a lot of friends… not because I’m sick of them, but because I’m just simply too busy to keep up with them. When you run your own company, work just has to come first. Thankfully I am in a relationship with someone in the business who has just as much going on as I do, and we work on a lot of different projects together. This makes my work life more personal if that makes any sense.

It does, and honestly it doesn’t sound that different from what happens in many other occupational fields – lawyers dating lawyers, teachers with teachers etc etc. So given all of this, where do you see yourself in five years?

In five years… hmm… well I really do hope that Burning Angel is just as big as all the other ‘big’ companies in the adult industry. I hope we can become a fun punky alternative to Hustler, Playboy, or Vivid for example while still being right up there with them… and if I don’t get us there, no one will!!

Damn Joanna, you really do have an impressive amount of ambition! I almost feel silly asking this after everything you’ve already said, but what else?

What do people need to know about you? Hmmm you know I don’t know… Check out some of my websites – joannaangel.com and burningangel.com are just two of them, but I actually have eight altogether and listing them all would just get silly! Oh, I also have a toy line! People can buy my sex toys in the BurningAngel.com store or at any adult retail store. You can also read my blog at xoxojoannaangel.com or follow me on twitter. Anything else that I haven’t said here I’m sure I will say there!”

Wow.

So many years ago, when I was first wrapping my head around porn and feminism and unicorns and all their associated complexities, I ran across a piece that Joanna had written on being a feminist with a porn site in Carly Milne’s (ed) Naked Ambition – Women who are Changing Pornography (2005). In it, Joanna discusses being kind of a bratty college kid looking for attention and the process she underwent to become a confident woman working to challenge popular notions of sexually desirable, hott, and what it means to be a feminist with her indie/alt sexiness.

She opened with a statement that has always stuck with me: “There are two kinds of sluts in this world: the kind I used to be, and the kind I am now. The former sleeps with guys for attention… The latter sleeps with guys because she genuinely likes having sex.” The fact that Joanna underwent some significant personal growth and reflection via the development of Burning Angel is embedded in this statement.

After she tells us the whole story, she closes with: “I’m not sure I started a revolution, but I know I started something pretty awesome, and most important, I feel like a real, true, honest-to-god feminist.” (sic) This statement has also always stuck with me. It gets at the authenticity of experience integral to feminist thought and action… a level of authenticity that is sadly absent from many dimensions of our culture and social world.

* * *

Porn Valley Vantage’s feature Back Stories explores the lives of people who work in the adult film industry, as well as those amorphous dimensions of the business that seem to have taken on a life of their own. Any comments or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

You may quote anything herein with the following attribution: “Reprinted from Porn Valley Vantage, copyright © Chauntelle Anne Tibbals, PhD (www.pornvalleyvantage.com).”

Porn Valley Vantage – Critical Commentary on the Adult Film Industry

Therapeutic Back Massage May Lower the Blood Pressure of Hypertensive Persons in Charlotte NC

Category : Region II

Therapeutic Back Massage May Lower the Blood Pressure of Hypertensive Persons in Charlotte NC

Research has shown that therapeutic back massage may lower the blood pressure of hypertensive persons. Even other types of massage have been proven by studies to have beneficial effects in lowering blood pressure. People with hypertension could try therapeutic body massage services, including back massage therapy, foot massage therapy, reflexology massage therapy, Swedish massage therapy, deep tissue massage therapy and sports massage therapy from professional massage therapists in Charlotte NC.

A study done by Christine M. Olney, MSN, RN for the University of South Florida in Tampa, titled “The Effect of Therapeutic Back Massage in Hypertensive Persons: A Preliminary Study”  was published in Biological Research For Nursing, Vol. 7, No. 2. According to the study, hypertension is one of the most prevalent diseases in the United States and it is also very dangerous since it can cause damage to vital organs. No single primary cause has been identified for hypertension but one of the main factors is long term or chronic stress response that goes unchecked. Since massage therapists have long maintained that massage therapy can decrease blood pressure and mitigate hypertension by producing the relaxation response in patients, the study tested the effects of applying regular back massage on patients who have clinically diagnosed hypertension.

The study covered 14 patients. Eight patients were in the massage group. They were given 10 sessions of 10 minute back massage done three times a week. Six patients were in the control group. They were given 10 sessions of 10 minute relaxation also done three times a week. By the end of the study, the systolic and diastolic blood pressure of patients in the massage group showed a significant decrease.

Another study of the Touch Research Institute in the University of Miami’s School of Medicine and the Nova Southeastern University in Florida, done in May 1999, showed similar findings. It involved a group of thirty adults with hypertension whose blood pressure levels were under control in the previous six months. The participants were divided randomly into two groups – a massage therapy group and a progressive relaxation group.

Patients in the massage therapy group were given massages for thirty minutes in the afternoon or early evening two times a week for five consecutive weeks. Patients in the progressive relaxation group were taught progressive muscle relaxation exercises thy could do by themselves and were instructed to perform these for thirty minutes in the afternoon or early evening two times a week for five consecutive weeks.

Assessments and evaluations on the patients were done before and after the treatment period. The State Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used to measure their emotions. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) questionnaire was used to rate any symptoms of depression. The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) Self-report Symptom Inventory was used to check other symptoms of anxiety, depression and hostility. Saliva samples were taken to measure levels of cortisol, a stress hormone. Urine samples were taken to measure levels of cortisol and catecholamines which are biologically active amines that impact the cardiovascular and nervous systems. The patients’ blood pressures were also monitored.     

By the end of the five week study, both the massage group patients and progressive relaxation patients showed lower levels of anxiety and depression. Only the patients in the massage group, however, showed lowered levels of sitting blood pressure, lowered levels of stress hormones in both urinary and salivary tests, and lowered scores in tests for anxiety, depression and hostility.

You can surprise your family and friends with hypertension with massage gift cards so that they could relax and enjoy various therapeutic body massage services, including back massage therapy, foot massage therapy, reflexology massage therapy, Swedish massage therapy, deep tissue massage therapy and sports massage therapy from professional massage therapists in Charlotte NC while lowering their blood pressure in the process.

Related Nova Southeastern University Articles

Taking Back America – This is My Country!

Category : Student National Pharmaceutical Association

Taking Back America – This is My Country!

Yes it is time for change!

If the people of America want to get control of their country now is the time but it can only happen if they take responsibility for what happens in their country. You see, people seem to have forgotten the rest of the story when it comes to our Bill of Rights. When they published the full title of the Amendments to the Constitution the editors left out part of the title. It should have read the Bill of Rights and Responsibilities.

There is no better generation to fix that problem than the battle tested, Cold War conditioned, oil shortage hardened Baby Boomers who are the only generation of the past century to understand the price of freedom and the dangers of democracy. I think every person who cares and wants things better should wear a tee shirt and paste bumper stickers that proclaim, “This is My Country!”

We can start by telling the politicians who want to be president that we the people will tell them what we need and what to do. Last time I checked they work for us. So the true Agenda for Change will be presented in this series of articles on Taking Back America. The pollsters, political advisors and advertising agencies that put words or sound bytes into the mouths of politicians have it all wrong. They are the very people who got us into this mess.

No we need to give government back to the people, give God back to the government and give meaning back to our Declaration and Constitution. We need to provide what people need, stop promoting what we don’t need, and start seeing government act like our friend and protector rather than a front for greed and power hungry individuals or corporations.

America must be wealthy, not the rulers who try and run or own America. Don’t you think those who claim to know have victimized us for long enough? We want a nation where housing laws protect the homeowners not the mortgage and financial institutions. We want banking laws that protect the citizens not the credit card companies, debt collectors, lawyers and hidden fees.

Our government licenses telephone companies, television and radio stations, banks, mortgage companies, investment banks, doctors and stock brokers among many others, while we regulate the stock market, commodity market (including the price of oil and food), energy companies, interstate commerce, foreign aid and practically every other aspect of our lives. Do you feel protected?

We spend more money protecting oil producing nations, arms dealers, drug companies, banks and investment houses than we do protecting people and that has simply got to change. Look at the cost, 0 billion and 4,000 American lives in Iraq to protect the Arab nations from Arab terrorists, or is it the Arab oil producers from disruption? What do we get? Record oil prices, no effort by OPEC to increase production and lower prices, and the scorn of the world.

Or how about our Afghanistan experience? We spend billions to chase the terrorists out of Afghanistan into hiding in Pakistan, a nation where we spend billions to protect the military and government that gives the terrorists safe haven. We have no viable foreign policy, we just support the arms dealers of the world who make sure there is always civil unrest, genocide and demigods running amok where we can spend billions more defending people. If America stopped financing war directly and indirectly do you think the arms dealers would spend their own money to cause wars?

Back in the good old USA we have more than enough wars of our own to fight against the destruction of our immune systems by the pharmaceutical companies, the addictions imposed on us by television, video games, hospitals and doctors, the health care industry, the wellness industry, the physical education industry, and all those who think the only way to good health is through the pocketbook.

Then there are the phone companies, banks and credit card companies with their incredible hidden fees and confusing billings, insurance companies that increase rates for reasons having nothing to do with their insurance coverage, the media whose message is always influenced by the advertising dollars it might generate, and the government who works for everyone but the people it is supposed to represent.

Oh it is time for change all right, and the change we need must be cataclysmic to do any good. All the shadowy figures that profit from our difficulties, steal from our treasury and attempt to influence our minds and destroy our wills are counting on us being too weak, too self-centered and too preoccupied to bring about change but I say they are wrong. Once again the bad guys have underestimated the power of freedom and the will of the people.

Proudly display your sign This is My Country and then do what they don’t expect, show you care. Help establish the Agenda for Change that we need, not the one politicians say we need. Start out by making a concerted effort to send a message to the oil profiteers by joining in a national effort to stay at home from Memorial Day until the Fourth of July, Independence Day, and reduce oil and gas consumption as much as possible.

Spend weekends with your family, seeing what you missed in your community, state and surrounding areas. Enjoy the local festivals and events. Turn off television and limit your time on the Internet and we can start to get back our nation. Asking you to save money does not sound like too much to ask.

What are the targets for change?

1. Money Mongers of the Financial Institutions

Who are these people and what threat do they represent? Well, the intricate web of interlocking ownership, access to media, control of pricing in stocks, currency, commodities and bonds, and insulation from scrutiny probably make this the single most powerful force on Earth, capable of controlling governments and destroying opposition without ever getting their own hands dirty. You see they are invisible to the general public.

Financial institutions control the world simply put and they do not serve the world in the process, as serving is not a good return on investment. They set up mutual funds to consolidate investment power and get government to create more sources of funds and turn them over to the financiers to manage such as pension funds, 401K funds, IRAs and many others.

They create financial “experts” to tell us what is happening to our investment markets and how to invest what money we do control completely ignoring the conflicts of interest when the greatest beneficiaries of the advice are the market makers, the very financial institutions whose experts are giving supposedly objective market advice.

What does that mean? The media takes the advice of industry experts and tells us the price of oil is going up because of the potential for a hurricane in the gulf that may or may not disrupt supply lines and drilling operations. A suicide bombing in Iraq shows that the crude oil supply from that country is not stable so a shortage of future oil may result if a bombing of the oil pipelines is successful. Cold weather in American means there will be a shortage of heating oil no matter that there are sufficient inventories already in the country. So the price of oil goes up, and up and up.

Who benefits? The owners of the crude oil, the companies that pay them for the crude, the banks that finance the companies, the stockholders that own shares of the companies, the IRAs, 401Ks, pension funds and mutual funds that pump money into the companies, the companies selling and buying their stocks, or the companies setting market prices? Guess what, all of them could be part of the financial institutions benefiting from the market manipulations caused by the speculative reports on the industry by the media.

So why does the Federal Trade Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission let them do this? The FTC and SEC are supposed to be our government watchdogs protecting the public from unscrupulous financial manipulators. For two years the same financial sector was behind the unethical, immoral and often-illegal manipulation of the sub-prime mortgage markets as well which nearly sent the USA into recession and certainly left millions of homeowners in foreclosure. Where were the federal regulators?

2. Mortgage Lenders – Vampires of the Golden Dream

Even though mortgage lenders can be owned, controlled or manipulated by the financial sector and banking institutions they are often set up independently until they finish preying on an unsuspecting public, having got caught using questionable practices (sub-prime loans for example), using heavy handed tactics, misleading consumers and initiating mortgage foreclosures.

When this happens the lenders now approaching bankruptcy get bought out by the financial and banking sectors that are seeking to acquire real estate property at far below the loan value. So losses are written off, property is acquired far below the loan value, new mortgages are written to resell or refinance the property, a few million people lose their homes due to foreclosures, and the financial institutions now have a new division with secure assets and credit worthy clients.

Of course we then lose sight of the fact illegal mortgages and unethical selling practices caused the bail out cycle to take place. Or that mortgage lenders, sales people, lawyers and credit rating firms were all players in this billion-dollar scam. That closing fees, collection fees and late fees have made someone millions of dollars at the expense of the hapless homeowners.

Finally even the government backed mortgage programs like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, (what great names for federal backed mortgage players), not to mention the long list of programs such as VA, Indian, Rural, Low Income and other federal mortgage and housing programs must be ever more vigilant to root out corruption, contract fixing, slipshod construction and repair work, inefficient heating and utilities and other problems that beset our federal and state housing efforts.

3. Credit Card Industry Standards, Fees and Collection Methods

Now this is an area of regulatory meltdown and benign neglect involving federal and state agencies ranging from the FTC to Congress, from the SEC to Justice Department. There is a body of law at both the state and federal levels that regulates these practices but no one seems to pay attention.

The issuance of credit cards through the mail and Internet and the proliferation of offers from credit card companies are astounding. The never-ending changes in interest rates charged, the justification for such changes, the explanation of such practices and the downright deception in consumer information is appalling and predatory.

Fees change constantly for ATM charges, handling, processing, vendor, fraud, security, and any other excuse to stick it to the consumer. Credit rating companies feed information to credit card companies and collection companies making the whole business of debt collection a financial windfall to lawyers, collection agencies, process servers and even the courts. Lies regarding the rights of the cardholder are overwhelming to most people, threatening to them and their credit, and fraught with heavy-handed tactics.

Simply stated there is no protection for people from getting the cards, understanding the changing fees, and especially getting caught in the late payment and collection process. Debts are written off yet collection efforts go full steam. When debts should be forgiven efforts are still made to scare the consumers into making payments. If we allow a credit card company to write off the bad debt, then why is the collection industry pursuing the poor consumer with no money? Why are the bad debts written off years before the debt is forgiven to the consumer?

4. Health Care Industry Cost, Insurance and Unnecessary Treatment

Just look at the facts and there is no doubt this system is broken. In 2006 we spent .1 trillion on health care, over ,026 for every person in the USA, and it took over 16% of our Gross Domestic Product. That is 4.3 times more money than we spent on defense. The cost of health care increases at more than double the inflation rate annually.

At 16% of GDP we have the highest health care costs of any developed nation with the next highest being Switzerland 10.9%, Germany 10.7%, Canada 9.7% and France 9.5%. Americans spent one third more on health care than any of these nations, and while 50 million Americans do not have health insurance all of the citizens in the other nations mentioned receive health care. At our current pace we will be spending trillion on health care in just 7 years, by 2015.

With the war in Iraq one might expect the cost of health care for veterans to be substantial as treatment in the war zone is far improved from earlier wars and for every death of a soldier there are 9 wounded soldiers that return home. Yet the cost of veteran’s health care drops to ,000 per person, ,000 less per year than civilians.

What is causing these statistical aberrations? Are we much sicker than citizens of the other nations? Is there a greater medical risk to civilians in America than our soldiers in Iraq? Why are 50 million Americans uninsured when all of the citizens of other nations receive health care?

According to the latest statistics employer paid health insurance premiums in the USA were ,500 for families and about ,200 for individuals. That means annual health insurance premiums account for a substantial portion of health care costs. Something is very wrong with the system.

So what is the average educational debt for new doctors coming into the market? According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, the average educational debt of indebted graduates of the class of 2006 (including pre-med borrowing) is 0,571. The average debt of graduating medical students increased in 2006 by 8.5 percent over the previous year. 72 percent of graduates have debt of at least 0,000. 86.6 percent of graduating medical students carry outstanding loans. 40.2 percent of 2006 graduates have non-educational debt, averaging ,689. Source: AAMC 2006 Graduation Questionnaires

So how much do they make when they graduate? Cardiologists were the most sought-after specialists last year, fetching salaries ranging from 4,000 to 5,000 and averaging 0,000 a year, according to surveys. Close behind cardiologists are radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. Now why do we loan med students the money when bank financing would be readily available in light of their low risk?

5. Pharmaceutical Industry Proliferation of Prescription Drugs

This can be short and sweet. In 2002 we spent 2 billion on prescription drugs and in 2006 we spent 7 billion on prescription drugs. One out of every five Americans takes 5 or more prescriptions per day. All Americans average 2.9 prescriptions per day. Our senior citizens, who are increasing very rapidly with the aging of the Baby Boomers, averaged 9 for prescriptions in 1992, ,205 for prescriptions in 2000, and ,912 in 2005 with spending expected to reach ,805 in 2010.

Every day it seems the health authorities announce yet another prescription drug that does not work, or whose long-term effects are determined to be more dangerous than expected. Yet every day it seems there are new prescriptions for new diseases. We live longer but spend far more. Kids are over-prescribed with Ritalin and other drugs. They are addicted to drugs they don’t even take raiding medicine cabinets for the new drug culture.

6. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Drug Approval Process

If drug prices in America have been rising almost five times as fast as inflation then the FDA must assume some of the responsibility as they are the regulatory agency charged with overseeing the over-the-counter and prescription drugs so abundant in our society.

The FDA new drug approval process with layers of clinical animal and human trials is the most costly, most lengthy and often most bizarre in terms of protocols and criteria for approval in the world. It is a process designed for the benefit of wealthy pharmaceutical companies, not for the small and independent research companies and laboratories.

Major pharmaceutical firms have managed to negotiate with FDA for new drug approval even if the drug extends the life expectancy of the patient by just 30 days. Yet when these products are sold to the public no one seems to mention they might only be good for 30 days at a cost of thousands of dollars

Things have gotten so ridiculous in the approval process that television ads for the drug Celebrex contain so many warnings of side effects and drug interactions that the ad actually states “the FDA says the benefits may outweigh the risks” when taking it. Are they crazy? It might be safe to take it?

Human trials approved by FDA require a protocol where half of the patients are given a placebo rather than the drug so results taking the drug can be measured against a control group not taking the drug. Not a bad practice unless the drug is experimental and the disease is going to kill the patient.

For example, stage 3 cancer patients have weeks or months to live. At stage 3 any normal and extremely expensive treatment like chemo, radiation or surgery has already failed. When they are offered a chance to participate in an experiment that might save their life and the option is certain death you might think they would jump at the chance, but that is not the case.

Why would they sign up when only half the people will even receive the treatment, with the other half getting meaningless placebos? If they are in the half that gets the candy and not the drug they die. If they get the drug there is a chance they might live. When you are facing death there should not be a 50-50 chance you won’t get the treatment.

Other problems with the industry include their price gouging, opposition to generic drugs selling for much less, opposition to foreign drugs also selling for much less, payments to doctors for prescribing their drugs, and unsubstantiated claims regarding over-the-counter drugs like cough syrup which has been proven to do no good.

7. Agriculture – Food Testing, Ingredients and Source

You go to the grocery store, check the fresh meat, see something that looks nice and red and fresh and buy it. Or maybe you buy the chicken to fry up for dinner. Then again you might buy pet food for your favorite dog or cat. Now did anyone tell you fresh meat like beef should not be red? Did they tell you color dyes and carbon monoxide are used to give the cuts of meat that color and they are injected in the butcher shop?

Did they tell you the chicken was raised in a hen house and pumped with hormones, steroids and God knows what else to fatten it up for the slaughter? Did they tell you about everything you just bought included rendered animal parts?

Did they mention rendering plants use raw product including thousands of dead dogs and cats; heads and hooves from cattle, sheep, pigs and horses; whole skunks; rats and raccoons? Did they mention the millions of maggots swarming over the carcasses? Did they tell you the carcasses would be ground up and cooked to create batches of yellow grease, meal and bone meal, and that the meat and bone meal would be used as a source of protein and other nutrients in poultry, swine and pet foods?

That the animal fat is used as an “energy source” and millions of tons will be trucked to poultry ranches, cattle feed-lots, dairy and hog farms, fish-feed plants and pet-food manufacturers where it is mixed with other ingredients to feed the billions of animals that meat-eating humans, in turn, will eat.

When you look at the ingredient label and it says the meat included protein it sounds good but is that protein from the rendered carcasses and what are the health consequences of eating a standard diet of rendered byproduct? The deadly Mad Cow disease was caused by feeding rendered products to cattle.

8. Campaign Reform – Empty Promises and Empty Wallets

For the first time in our history the presidential campaign alone in 2008 is expected to cost over one billion dollars. Now that is a whole lot of money being spent to win a job that pays 0,000 a year and only lasts four years. One billion dollars spent to make ,600,000. If that is the result of capitalism then we might have a problem.

Campaign reform has been talked about more and acted upon less than any other issue facing congress and the president. Political advertising costs are criminal. Some campaigns spend more money raising money than they do getting elected. Special interest groups give to candidates, give more to national political parties, more to state political parties and then spend money themselves to influence elections.

Over billion will be spent running for president and that can be changed if the president and congress have the guts. Paid ads can be stopped, special interest funding can be stopped, and a logical schedule for primaries can be held. Candidates can receive free media time since all the airways are government regulated. Voter registration can be increased.

There are about 226 million people eligible to vote in the USA and about 142 million are registered to vote. In 2004 about 121 million did vote for president. That means about 53% of the eligible voters participated in the last presidential election, a pretty weak total for the citadel of democracy in the world. That needs to be fixed. Require automatic voter registration with social security cards or drivers licenses if need be but get people back involved in the process. We can’t make people vote but we can make sure they have the opportunity to vote.

9. Immigration Reform – The Slumbering Social Issue of the Day

So far the candidates have done a masterful job of avoiding the issue of Immigration reform although before the campaign heated up they had a variety of ideas to offer. Now it seems the ideas have been taken off the table in hopes no one noticed they flip flopped on an issue.

There are a few areas of agreement. For one everyone agrees we need to strengthen border security on both the Canadian and Mexican borders. We also acknowledge that there are millions of Mexican workers illegally in the USA gainfully employed at jobs typically not wanted by Americans. What to do about them is a huge problem.

Since there is widespread opposition to any kind of amnesty program allowing them to remain without consequence perhaps a better alternative would be to allow those illegal immigrants and their families to remain with a permanent work visa if they are gainfully employed and have paid taxes in the United States.

They are here and they pay our income and sales taxes. They have cars and drivers licenses. They are making a substantial contribution to Social Security even though they cannot draw benefits. What amnesty are we giving them? If we throw them out don’t we owe them back their income, sales and social security payments? I say they have paid enough already for a permanent visa and they should be welcomed if they complete our citizenship requirements.

If the illegal immigrants that are gainfully employed and contributing to our tax and social security system are granted permanent work visas, overnight we will reduce the border security issues saving substantial money and improving relations between our two countries. This will free up resources to pursue the criminal elements from foreign countries that come illegally for far more sinister reasons.

Not only do millions of illegal immigrants pay taxes and provide services we would not otherwise have but they are also victims to hordes of unscrupulous people involved in car sales and repair, medical treatment, legal assistance, and many other areas because they have no way to protect themselves. They cannot go to law enforcement agencies for help, as they would be prosecuted. The simple act of granting well-earned permanent work visas would stop predators from taking advantage of their status.

Find More Student National Pharmaceutical Association Articles

When Things Get Back to Normal / What Will Normal Look Like

Category : Region V

When Things Get Back to Normal / What Will Normal Look Like

“Boy, I’ll be glad when things get back to normal!”

“When will we get back to normal?”

“When things get back to normal, I’ll

How often are you hearing these comments?  Whether it’s in everyday conversation or the news media, everyone is talking, wondering & speculating “When will we hit bottom?” and when we do hit bottom,  “How long will it take to get back to normal?”  It’s funny that no one seems to be asking, “When we get back to Normal what will Normal look like?”

Lylene & I attended a business meeting a few weeks ago. The subject was the economy on both the local & national levels.  The program was put on by a highly respected educator from Western Washington University.  He opened the session asking for the audience to put aside ideology completely & instead provide dialogue regarding the “State of the Economy” in Whatcom County.  There was no such thing as a right or wrong answer, no pre-judgments, no-judgmental comments – just dialogue, just ideas.  Just open it up and let it all pour out.

Unfortunately, that is easier said that done – but not impossi

I was part of such a group 5 ½ years ago when I was treated at Loma Linda University for prostate cancer.  Being treated at the same time were 350 other guys, all with the same ailment.  The thing that was interesting was that whether they drove a Cadillac or Chevy Nova, whether they had a PhD or a high school education or whether they vacationed in the Caribbean or their local camp grounds, when this group was together, the conversation always very open & sincere.  “How long have you been here, How’s it going, Are you feeling okay, Can you pee, or Can you…?”  Believe me, the truth was laid bare with no reservation.  Dialogue?  You bet.  Judgmental?  Not a chance.  Supportive?  I have not seen anything like it since I was in the Marine Corps.  Ideology?  No such thing – just honest dialogue, plain & simple.  It’s amazing what happens when the only common denominator is 350 guys in hospital gowns with their rear ends exposed – pretty hard to be judgmental in that sort of environment.  Things got to the basics real quick.

It’s too bad that the sense of urgency & openness that existed among this diverse group of guys can’t be replicated in meetings such as Lylene and I attended in Bellingham a few weeks ago.  I guess a pre-requisite to attending the meeting could be a dress code requiring only white hospital gowns, but probably no one would show up but the Bellingham Herald reporter – and then only for a photo op.

Anyway, the call of the speaker for dialogue instead produced one liners, hard and fast opinions and accusations, leaving little room for open ended discussion.  Interestingly enough, the overriding theme was how long will this last (the recession), when will we hit bottom & how fast will the recovery be so that things can get back to normal.  The thing that was especially interesting was that in the Q & A session of the meeting, no one talked about what the “New Normal” will look like. That, to me, is the question that would or could result in some interesting discussion and needs to be reckoned with.

The reason for the “New Normal” is that just as the world changed after Sept 11, 2001, I think the financial tsunami that has hit the world economy will change us in ways we can’t yet imagine.

My “Financial Normal” has evolved over time

1)       Early 1950′s:  I opened up a saving account  to save for college

2)       Late 1950′s:  I bought a guitar from Deye’s Music Studio & paid for it .00 at a time until it was paid in full & then was able to take it home.

3)       1940′s through 1965:  Customers charged their merchandise at my Mom & Dad’s drug store.  No interest was paid on past due accounts.  I’m sure that Mom & Dad suffered some loses but at that time a man’s word was pretty much his bond.

4)       1965:  I was discharged from the US Marine Corps & used the GI Bill to help finance my college education

5)       1970:  Lylene & I were turned down when we tried to rent a TV for a few months because we didn’t have a credit card

6)       1960′s through 1970′s:  Major department stores had layaway programs.  If you couldn’t afford to buy things, the merchant simply put it away for you.  You paid them monthly for the item until it was paid for & then you’d take it home.

7)       1972:  I graduated from college and went to work for the largest retailer in the world.  They didn’t have a credit card option but instead had a “layaway program”. 

8)       1972:  Lylene & I bought our 1st house in Tacoma.  We bought it as a veteran with 0 down & a low interest rate.  The price of the home was ,000.00 & the payment was less than 0.00 per month

9)       1975:  My 1st credit card was a Union gas card

10)    1980′s:  I always felt bad when I saw someone using their credit card at the grocery store because in our family it meant that you were on hard times

11)    1991:  Lylene & I re-financed that house in Tacoma to buy some real estate in Bellingham

12)    1990′s:  We started to use a VISA card for the majority of our purchases to include groceries – Wow, had we changed!

So that was our “Normal.”

Obviously, not only did we change but so did lending practices. 

Up through the early 1990’s, if you wanted to buy a house & had only a minimal down payment, the options were usually either FHA or VA financing.  There were limiters on the use of  VA loans which limited the veteran to only 1 active VA loan & thereby eliminated the use of this product for the accumulation of real estate.  FHA had similar restrictions ie: you could have only 1 outstanding FHA loan with a loan to value higher than 75%.  At the same time, a borrower could usually only have a maximum of 4 home loans outstanding that were backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie.  So if you wanted to get creative with financing, you usually had to work with the seller, because there were no programs available though conventional lenders. Throughout the 1980’s & 1990’s Republicans and Democrats agreed that while on the one hand, home ownership was one of the keystones of a solid economy, on the other hand it was getting more difficult for Americans to buy.  From 1980 to 1995 the number of Americans who owned their own homes stayed pretty much at 64%.  The goal of the US government was to increase that percentage and therein lay the seeds to the crisis we are facing today.  

Until 1995, if a bank loaned money for a conventional home loan, the buyer typically had to come up with a down payment of 20%.  It’s not hard to imagine how difficult this was for the average home buyer as prices increased.  The Community Reinvestment Act, passed by the US Congress in 1977 to make it easier for banks to loan to people with low incomes, was revised in 1995 to allow banks to “securitize” these loans.  They could bundle their loans & sell them at a profit to large investment companies, who then sold them to individual investors in the form of stocks & bonds.  This took the loans off the banks’ books, making it possible for them to make more home loans.  This they did repeatedly & effectively.  To make loans more attractive to the consumer, new loan products were developed:  adjustable rates, shorter terms, interest only, 80/20 loans, lower down payments…and so on.  As a result, many people were put in homes that they could afford only if values continued to increase so they could re-finance them at their inflated value. Home prices were rising so quickly in many areas that buyers felt little risk.  Even if they still couldn’t afford the payment after the run up in value, they could sell the house and make a handsome profit.

Running side by side with this investment frenzy was the stock market bubble with “Tech” stocks in the late 1990’s.  As investors in these stocks took their money out of the stock market they invested into the real estate market, which only added to the price run up.

In 1999, Congress repealed the “Glass-Steagull Act” which until then had prevented commercial banks from owning stocks & other securities.  This allowed Banks to actually own mortgage backed securities, which, as real estate pricing continued to heat up, looked like a great investment for the banks.

President Bush wanted to increase the number of home owners, and, in particular, the number of minority home owners.  In June of 2002, he announced “America’s Home Ownership Challenge” which called on the lending industry to increase the number of minority owned homes by 5.5 million units.  Congress then passed the “American Dream Down Payment Act” allowing minorities with poor credit & no savings to get a mortgage with the US government picking up the down payment. About the same time, the government encouraged Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac to increase the number of home loans to minorities.

The stage was set for a real “Wild West Show” in lending practices.  Banks were falling over themselves to create the greatest number of loans.  Standards for income levels, credit scores and down payments were all thrown out the window in the enthusiasm of making the deal.  The “Perfect Storm” was set for the greatest financial catastrophe since the Great Depression.  In 2007 it all started to unravel, and the entire economy was impacted.  The hope today is that the Stimulus Package that President Obama will be signing this next week will bring to the economy enough shock & awe to break the back of the recession & get things back to “Normal”.

And what will that look like?

Will normal be easy access to credit card purchasing?

Will normal be easy access to lines of credit?

Will normal be easy access to car loans?

Will normal be home ownership for everyone?

Will normal be a college education for those who choose to go?

Will normal be a standard of living that has been unattainable for the rest of the world, but that we have all become accustomed to?

Or…will normal become more of what Lylene & I experienced through the 50’s, 60’s, 70’s and 80’s?

I think whatever normal will be and how soon it can be achieved will be determined not by those who wear their opinions & ideology on their sleeves but by those who leave their egos at home & bring dialogue to the table.  Our history suggests that it is possible.  The Colonists did it in the Constitutional Convention in the 1780’s, American citizens did it when they worked their way out of the Great Depression of the 1930’s, those who lived through the 2nd World War did it with the Marshall Plan & those who wondered if all citizens of the US would ever be truly equal proved it with the election of the 1st black American to the White House.

How quickly we can establish the “New Normal” that we want to live in will depend in large part on whether we can mentally approach the problem in hospital gowns with our rear-ends exposed & not get hung up on ideology and positions.  Without true dialogue, where all parties are considering all options and focusing on the needs of the country, the “New Normal” & when we arrive there may be a long ways off..

Find More Loma Linda University Articles